Pages

Monday, March 26, 2012

Globalization in the Political World



Globalization is a common word in today’s society. When I think of globalization, I tend to imagine all of the continents merging together to form one unified and informed community. Everyone from different communities would be able to come together to discuss important issues and be on the same knowledge level of current events. Sounds great, right? Well, thinks aren’t always as perfect as we may want them to be. On the political spectrum, globalization and politics do not always mash up so well. In a paper by Susan Berger, she writes “globalization undermines the national state…not only by shrinking the resources under national control for shaping economic and social outcomes, but also by reducing the government’s legitimacy and authority in the eyes of the public.” There have been many instances that could back up this point. For example, President George W. Bush claimed a “War on Terror” in September of 2001. He was hit hard with criticism. In 2005, Bush came out with a statement stating another reason why America needs to fight this war in Iraq. He claimed that it was needed to “protect the country’s vast oil fields.” The Democrats denounced his war style claiming that “’President Bush
has failed to put together a plan, so despite the bravery and sacrifice of our troops, we are not making the progress that we should be in Iraq. The troops, our allies, and the American people deserve better leadership from our commander in chief.’” The American people were beginning to lose faith in their leadership and the authority of the government was being weakened.    


Globalization is not just an economic phenomenon, but a political, cultural, military, and environmental one as well. What distinguishes globalization today is the speed and volume of cross-border contacts. The challenge U.S. policymakers face today is to recognize that fundamental change in world politics and to use America's unrivaled military, economic, and political power to fashion an international environment conducive to its interests and values.”


In my final blog post, I will be looking at the mass communication trends  of convergence, interactivity, and new definitions. 

Sources Used:
-The Globalization of Politics: American Foreign Policy for a New Century-Brookings Institute, Ivo H. Daalder
-"Globalization and Politics" by Suzanne Berger
-"Bush gives new reason for Iraq War"- Associated Press


2 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As you pointed out in this post, globalization is not just economic. It is far reaching and extends into almost all aspects of life. Ignoring that this change is happening is not an option. But it is also not an easy one and as you said, there is a large disconnect between government and globalization - and this needs to be remedied in order for success. - Jordan Sandwick

    ReplyDelete